Thurrock
Nub News Logo
Nub News

Lawns Court developer calls for community support ahead of appeal hearing

By Nub News Reporter   5th Oct 2025

Residents have repeatedly complained about the unkempt site.
Residents have repeatedly complained about the unkempt site.

AHEAD of an appeal hearing later this month, a property developer has aired his grievances against Thurrock Council and says he has been misrepresented in the public eye over a controversial housing site in East Tilbury.

The site, which has been left incomplete and has been widely branded as an eyesore, is the Lawns Court Development in the centre of the village built by Ingleton Luxury Homes.

In July last year its director, Tommy Ingleton was prosecuted at Basildon Magistrates' Court by the council for failing to meet his responsibilities as a developer, and – after pleading guilty but claiming extenuating circumstances – he was fined £934 with costs and a victim surcharge. Thurrock Council had estimated its costs at £4,184. Mr Ingleton was told personally to pay half that, making the total due to court £3,400.

He has to pay it at a minimum of £200 a month until the debt is cleared.

The company, Ingleton Luxury Homes, was fined £1,000 with a £400 victim surcharge. It also has to pay £2,092 towards the council's costs making a total of £3,492. However, after Mr Ingleton told the court the company literally had no cash and no immediate opportunity to raise any, payment was deferred until January 2025.

Earlier this year Thurrock Council again took Mr Ingleton and his company to court over irregularities with his planning permission. This time Mr Ingleton pleaded not guilty and in court launched another blistering attack on the council. That case is ongoing and, following a case management hearing recently, is awaiting a trial date.

Mr Ingleton has issued a statement ahead of a public hearing set for Thursday, 23 October at the Old Court House in Grays, calling on residents to make their voices heard and support efforts to complete the stalled development.

The appeal relates to a council decision to reject his application for a modification to an earlier permission granted for the Lawns site.

In summary, Mr Ingleton was asking for a change in the contributions he had previously agreed to pay.

He asked for the 'replacement of on-site affordable housing with a commutable sum and variation of the payment trigger for the education contributions'.

All documentation relating to the rejected application and the appeal request can be found via this link.

Nub News featured the site in a report in July last year:-

Mr Ingleton says: "For the last four years, we have been battling with Thurrock Council's planning department to get this site back on track, so it can finally be completed and secured for the benefit of the community. In that time:

  • I have been unfairly made responsible for other people's crimes, including illegal fly-tipping, and heavily fined as a result.
  • I lost my company and have faced detrimental, damaging treatment from Thurrock Council which has directly stopped progress on the site.
  • The delays have left space for antisocial behaviour and illegal dumping, which we are determined to stop.

"Some false news has been spread suggesting we are trying to deny the community education payments and social housing. The opposite is true:

"We have increased our offer to the Council above the amounts previously agreed, including higher education contributions and a substantial affordable housing sum.

"Yet once again we have been blocked by falsified numbers and obstruction from Thurrock's planning department."

Mr Ingleton says progress is now only possible through the forthcoming appeal process.

"Like residents, I want Lawns Court finished properly. Leaving it as it is has caused real problems for the community. My focus is on securing the necessary planning changes so the site can be completed to the high standards originally intended."

As part of his appeal, Mr Ingleton has put forward proposals that he says would increase community contributions beyond those in the original Section 106 agreement, including:

£97,101 towards education (higher than the £70,514.50 originally agreed).

£169,109 towards affordable housing across Thurrock.

Mr Ingleton says the contributions, if secured, would be payable to Thurrock Council to be used at its discretion for the benefit of local services.

"The public inquiry gives us a chance to unlock funding, clean up the site, and deliver real benefits to East Tilbury. This is not about me personally – it is about ensuring the community gets the outcome it deserves", he adds.

Mr Ingleton is encouraging residents and local organisations to participate in the public inquiry process, either by attending or submitting letters of support, to show that there is strong local demand for the site to be completed.

"If people want to see change, now is the time to speak up. I have always said I am an open book – I welcome all comments and questions. The important thing is that residents have their say, so the Inspector can make an informed decision."

Mr Ingleton has taken to social media to put his case and has entered into dialogue with many residents who have raised questions.

One that has been asked several times is how he plans to get the site up to scratch, claiming he has lost his business and is financially broken.

He has responded by saying: "I understand your concerns. To clarify: when planning is secured, we as the landowners will have new options available that will allow us to raise the funding needed — either by setting up a new contracting company or by engaging another principal contractor to complete the works.

"As part of building out the remainder of the site, we will also prioritise finishing the existing houses, including fixing roof drainage and addressing any other property issues.

"The truth is we've faced serious financial hardship directly because Thurrock Council rescinded on written agreements, which caused our funding to be abruptly pulled. That's why progress stalled — not because of a lack of will on our part."

Thurrock Council has not commented ahead of the hearing.

Related stories:

https://thurrock.nub.news/news/local-news/village-land-that-has-caused-concern-for-residents-is-up-for-sale-will-it-mean-completion-at-last-of-eyesore-estate-154729

https://thurrock.nub.news/news/local-news/residents-say-village-housing-development-site-is-an-eyesore-and-a-health-hazard-and-time-has-come-for-action-130054

https://thurrock.nub.news/news/local-news/developer-applies-to-council-for-big-cut-in-community-payment-saying-land-was-wrongly-valued-community-could-lose-out-on-hundreds-of-thousands-if-he-is-right

     

CHECK OUT OUR Jobs Section HERE!
thurrock vacancies updated hourly!
Click here to see more: thurrock jobs

     

The Ball is in your court. Our long-term GOAL
is to help our local community to grow.

On our part, we are making a connection between local news, local people and local businesses.
This connection is the key to community success.

Now the ball is in your court.
You can support us with a small payment or at least read us for free.
Take a shot yourself and then pass the ball to your friends!
Monthly supporters will enjoy:
Ad-free experience

Share:

Comments (2)

Post comment

Bowling.d7

so here we are back again ,my first comment to object apparently got redacted due to sensitive information but the lions share was left in . I find it incredible that thurrock council have failed to use their powers under section 215 of town and country planning to make good the site and then chase the developer for recompense .why didnt they ? why is the public inquiry happening in grays and not east tilbury ? This area is a conservation area which means the council have failed again . The financial set up of these premises was a very strange questionable agreement ? why was it ever allowed perhaps mr ingleton wants to tell us why in the old court house grays on the 23rd of october 2025 at 10a,m, The rumour that the tenants of the leasehold premises were denied the residential energy price cap because each premise was set up as an individual business ? i have asked him to clarify this agreement which i find troubling . Rents being collected of 1400/month ? for each occupied property even with tax must make profit. so back to my initial comment and sensitive information , all i can think is planning officers names . A joke that objectors names and addresses 51 of them is ok but paid officers working in a professional capacity are redacted , to protect them from what exactly ? hiding from a strange arrangement perhaps ? now a last minute deal and a relatively small fine ?i would encourage the 51 commenters to attend as it is a public enquiry and in a place difficult to our east tilbury residents to get to . when i think of the way east tilbury residents have been fleeced ,just looking at the bata development 106 money and the facr that 68% of our money was used elsewhere not to mention the farce that was the latest mulberry development and the inspectors determination guided by the apparently satisfied planning officers who apparently failed to give our objections over and it would appear our money is again being directed to a project which i believe is being championed by an unnamed officer . i wonder if the truth will out indeed ever , Reset the venue to east tilbury so interested people from the public can attend without expense , the ethos of 106 is where there is the pain there is the gain .section 123 community infrastructure levy act determines the money is not council money and it is not to be used across the borough on any scheme invented up by the administration of the council , unsuprisingly but probably illegally unless your thurrock . i will attend open minded and hope that mr ingleton opens a potential can of worms and identifies the sensitive officers if indeed they are still here . there is a new set who refer to the mess as a legacy , but it is still the same organisation that spent a large amount of public money on hiding the real truth from the kvanagh investments and maintained secrecy over the grays underpass , the a13 and stanford le hope station ,not forgetting their very own council offices , which could have been used for this but they are probably hiring the old court house from themselves in order to put it towards their gambling debt obviously with public money. i think i will go and listen

Ingletonproperties

Official Statement – Lawns Court, East Tilbury

Following the recent Thurrock Nub News article covering the upcoming public inquiry for Lawns Court, I want to thank the publication for highlighting the ongoing issues surrounding the site and our continued efforts to resolve them.

However, a few important clarifications are needed to ensure the facts are clear and balanced:

Our Appeal is About Completion and Compliance — Not Avoidance
The current appeal under reference APP/M1595/Q/25/3368235 seeks to modify the existing Section 106 agreement under s.106A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
It does not remove obligations — it replaces undeliverable items with higher financial contributions that will directly benefit Thurrock’s housing and education services.

Community Benefit is Central
Our revised proposals increase the education contribution from £70,514 to £97,101, and provide a £169,109 affordable-housing contribution, both above the original figures.
These funds are ringfenced for Thurrock residents and aligned with CSTP2 of the Local Plan and NPPF §57.

The Site’s Current Condition is a Direct Result of Council Inaction
Since 2020, multiple requests for mediation and agreement on payment triggers have been ignored or backtracked upon by Thurrock Council’s Planning Department.
This stalemate has left the site unfinished and vulnerable to third-party fly-tipping and vandalism — issues that could have been prevented through cooperation.

Setting the Record Straight on Past Proceedings
It is incorrect to suggest that I was convicted of fly-tipping or criminal activity.
The matter related to a disputed compliance notice, not illegal dumping.
The Council itself later identified and publicly prosecuted the real offenders for the fly-tipping — as documented on their own website.

A Transparent Path Forward
I welcome open dialogue and have already met with local residents online and in person.
My objective is simple: to clean, complete, and deliver Lawns Court to the standard it was originally intended — creating a safe, secure, and attractive part of East Tilbury once more.

This is not a battle between a developer and a council — it’s about doing the right thing for a community that has waited far too long for action.
I encourage everyone to read the full appeal documents, available through the Planning Inspectorate, and judge the facts for themselves.

Thank you to everyone who has supported constructive engagement over the last few months. Together, we can finally turn this site into something East Tilbury can be proud of.

Tommy Ingleton
Director, Ingleton Property Ltd
Lawns Court Appeal – APP/M1595/Q/25/3368235
October 2025


Sign-up for our FREE newsletter...

We want to provide thurrock with more and more clickbait-free news.

     

...or become a Supporter.
Thurrock. Your Borough. Your News.

Local news is essential for our community — but it needs your support.
Your donation makes a real difference.
For monthly donators:
Ad-free experience